When considering a complaint, does the Victorian Ombudsman focus on reviewing the overall merits of a
complaint/matter, or reviewing the processes used by the provider, or both?
When considering a complaint, the Ombudsman is not limited to reviewing the technical validity of a
decision or action. The Ombudsman’s jurisdiction relates to administrative actions, but the
Ombudsman can form opinions about processes relevant to administrative actions and the fairness of those
actions. For example, the Ombudsman may conclude that particular administrative action by a university
was lawful, but that it was still unreasonable, unjust, oppressive, or wrong.
The Ombudsman can only form such opinions at the end of an investigation, however, these considerations
can guide a case officers’ decision-making. Case officers generally consider whether the facts of
the matter, together with applicable laws, policies and procedures, to ascertain if the university made
a reasonable decision. The Ombudsman does not have a specific process for dealing with university
related complaints. In some cases, they will consult with other case officers who may have more
experience in dealing with higher education complaints.